Talk:That Really Rustled My Jimmies

I'm not done with this page yet. I'll finish it later tonight. borowski 21:37, 23 February 2012 (EST)

Lame

This isn't even a meme, it's just an unfunny image macro. Plus, you almost never see this macro anywhere. What I'm saying is, this "article" is worthless.

BIBRulz 14:42, 24 February 2012 (EST)

• Agreed. Kill this article. Boyvinyl 14:46, 24 February 2012 (EST)

I agree that the article is badly written, but the meme is close to being confirmed on KYM and /v/ recently had the title changed to "jimmies", with a sticky of the meme previously put up. So it has decent internet relevance, but i do think this article is in dire need of being rewritten. Elvis 22:46, 26 February 2012 (EST)

I dunno, it just seems like such an article would have little to no relevance. BIBRulz 13:24, 27 February 2012 (EST)

Seems like damned good reasons for me. Article still sucks. Put it on BNA. Mike the Græt (Talk) 15:20, 27 February 2012 (EST)

Good idea

I don´t see what you´re all complaining about. I think the image is pretty funny. It clearly shows an emotional response to something, making it a good reaction-pic, and it´s a bit original. --Builder 08:45, 29 February 2012 (EST)

If you look here, the original page pretty much sucked ass and didn't state anything anybody with two good eyes couldn't see from the image macro. The article's still alive and doing better because it's now on the Bad New Articles list to encourage people to add it. We don't do pages for every image macro that we find on the internet that we think is funny, but as Elvis pointed out, this is apparently now a thing that's going on on 4chan. Mike the Græt (Talk) 14:39, 29 February 2012 (EST)

Wow

Someone actually managed to turn this into a half-decent article. I didn't think that was possible.

BIBRulz 02:18, 4 March 2012 (EST)

IRL Jimmy Rustles

http://www.facebook.com/jimmie.rustles.3 O.O--ChronicTehHedgehog 00:19, 28 June 2012 (EDT)