Bbb23

From Encyclopedia Dramatica
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by CurtainMan (talk | contribs) at 05:15, 5 September 2024. It may differ significantly from the current revision.
Jump to navigationJump to search
Any woman's wet dream. Right?
This person has Assburgers Syndrome,
so you can't say anything bad! :-(


Be aware of that, you insensitive fuck.

The subject of this article is a virgin with rage.

The subject of this article is a loudmouth on the internet but a pathetic loser in real life.

Bbb23 (pronounced bee-bee-bee-two-three or triple-B twenty-three) is an incel and an administrator of the English-language Wikipedia who craves the feeling of being above all else. He is known for his inability to accept criticism and for his insincere, self-righteous, hostile, and threatening behaviour towards anyone weaker than him while playing the friendly arse-kisser to anyone stronger than himself.[1]

He started editing Wikipedia in 2009 and became an administrator in July 2012 and a CheckUser in March 2015.[2][3][4]

Personality

Ever wondered how Bbb23 handles criticism?

Bbb23 is the textbook Internet tough guy. He enjoys playing god on a website to seek escape from his miserable sexless real life. Occasionally, a comment happens to trigger him hard, for example this one accurately calling him a sad little virgin.[5]

On his talk page

Bbb23 has the strange habit of scrubbing criticism off his talk page, be it ever so mild criticism, even from his administrator colleagues. Occasionally, he even removes posts for not being praise.[6][7]

His administrator buddies have protected his talk page against edits from unregistered editors and new accounts in order to shield him from critisicm.[8]

Hypocrisy

Before being an administrator, he complained about "incivility and aggression", saying "I find it ironic that many of these same editors happily display tags and comments about civility on their user pages. I guess they don't practice what they preach."[9]. Yet, after becoming an administrator, he became just that.

Thanklessness

In the ten years since the inception of the "thanks" button, he has never used it. Not even once.[10]

When a Greek Wikipedia editor warned the English Wikipedia administrators on their noticeboard that articles on Greek and Albanian history may be targeted by a vandalism campaign soon, rather than being appreciative of the warning, Bbb23 suggested that the editor who issued the warning should be blocked:

This is Popular Punk's first edit to en.wiki. WP:NOTHERE.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:10, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

[11]


Powerhungriness

Bbb23 could not care less about the declared mission of Wikipedia, as signified by his poor treatment of productive editors, immediate blocking of users for mild criticism,[12] and deletion sprees of valid articles which were independently approved by new page patrollers.[13] To Bbb23, Wikipedia only is a tool for inflating his ego through excercising authority over ordinary editors, not providing free knowledge. Whether his destructive behaviour is permitted by policy or not, him behaving this way indicates he derives satisfaction from it. Otherwise he would not do it.

I fully accept the reasoning behind my ban, however I noticed literally all of my articles have been reverted including articles such as Looney Tunes Cartoons that had been largely built up by other users, others include articles including a lot of my geographical stubs were also in the process of being built up by others, I feel it is unfair that these articles have been wiped in one swoop, many of them including Hill County Courthouse are a huge loss as they are listed monuments in the United States, I wondered if we could revert the G5 and do a manual review of such articles so that the relevant ones can be saved and edited by others. StaniforthHistorian (talk) 15:50, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

I've removed the section you posted below about your articles and G5. You have zero say in the application of G5 to your creations. Any more of this nonsense, and I'll revoke talk page access.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:52, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Articles he vengefully deleted were occasionally brought back by his administrator colleagues because they were too good to be deleted.[14] This shows Bbb23 has zero regard for the quality of an article. What actually matters to him is fullfilling his desire to excercise revenge against whoever dared to criticize him.[15]

He has a subpage proudly presenting a mass-deletion of eighty articles. As indicated by the blue links, almost all of them have been re-created. All those editors who re-created those articles could collectively have saved many hours of work if they could have started from existing articles. Instead, Bbb23 couldn't help but inflate his fragile ego by demolishing what others have built. Or perhaps this is his way of coping with his sexual frustration.[16]

Besides, Bbb23 is so bothered about trivial matters such as being called "dude" that he created an entire userbox about it. He also felt the need to tell us he had once been the victim of an unintentional block that was immediately lifted anyway. Oh, noez! How is that in relation to his behaviour towards others?[17][18]

In 2015, Bbb23 tried to become both a CheckUser and an oversighter, but the Wikipedia editor "NE Ent" exposed that Bbb23 has no real need for the oversight tool. Bbb23 tried utterly hard to contain his anger.[4]

If Wikipedia stopped existing, Bbb23 would not be sad due to the lost knowledge, but sad due to his lost ability to exercise control.

Loss of CheckUser tool

Bbb23 thought of himself as an untouchable lord from the heavens. That lasted until his arrogance caught up on June 18th, 2020. On that day, he woke up to a permission error when trying to access his favourite page, Special:CheckUser.

When Bbb23 saw this, he thought "Wait WHAT?! I am not a CheckUser?! Oh no… this can't possibly mean any good." - This is the ultimate nightmare of Bbb23. Oh, wait, it's not a nightmare. It's reality!

He ran afoul of the Arbitration Committee for habitually abusing his CheckUser tool for cyberstalking. He tried to drama quit Wikipedia to make them change their minds, but they didn’t, and his “retirement” only lasted few months before he came back to continue being a dickweed.

He couldn't stay away from Wikipedia

Out of rage, he slapped the "retired" template on his user page, even though its usage notes state "Do not use this template unless you plan to completely and permanently stop editing".[19][20]

Whoops! Looks like he is too hopelessly addicted to Wikipedia to stay away from it, the only place where he can feel above others. A few months of his insufferable real life and he thought "maybe retiring from Wikipedia wasn't such a good idea", and he couldn't help but be right back at Wikipedia.

In August 2020, the Wikimedia Office showed Bbb23 its fat middle finger (even fatter than angry Santa Claus' thick middle fingers!) and told him he can never be CheckUser again.[21]

When Bbb23 hears his favorite song, Dum Dee Dum, he gets excited and makes drunken dance movements to try to forget about his miserable and girlfriendless life outside Wikipedia. All he does is delete things and threaten people, because that is the highlight of his miserable days, where he can feel above others for once and get a hit of dopamine. He considers any criticism of him "trolling". He blocked this IP address, and carefully reverted every minor and harmless change the IP user made.

Every evening, Bbb23 goes to bed sorely wishing he could hold a pretty woman in his arms. But every evening, he realizes it is nothing but a far-reaching pipe dream because he is far too ugly for any woman to even consider him (except for unfeminine hags who look like Annegret Krampf-Karrenbauer).

References

  1. Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia (original URL)
  2. User contributions for Bbb23 - Wikipedia (earliest 50 edits)
  3. Requests for adminship/Bbb23
  4. 4.0 4.1 Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee - CheckUser and Oversight - 2015 CUOS appointments
  5. What do you think the user meant by "sad little virgins"? It sounds nasty, but I can't make any sense out of it. - Bbb23 (archive)
  6. Bbb23 removes post by administrator colleague Doug Weller, even though it wasn't even criticism of him. (4 April 2020) (archive)
  7. Bbb23 removes criticism by administrator colleague Ritchie333 (archive) - " ‘ArbCom has informed me that I am using my CU privileges in ways that violate policy.... I will not be responding to messages posted to my Talk page.’ There's your problem in a nutshell - you won't talk things through with people.
  8. Protection log - User talk:Bbb23 - Wikipedia
  9. User:Bbb23: Difference between revisions (1 August 2010) - Wayback Machine (mirror: archive.today)
  10. Empty thanks log of Bbb23 as of December 18, 2023
  11. Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Archive358 § Potential vandalism of articles regarding Greek and Albanian history
  12. User talk:Aron Manning § For the record - Wikipedia (2019)
  13. Deletion log of Bbb23 (2019-04-17) - see pages by HordeFTL
  14. Hill County Courthouse (archive) - deleted by Bbb23, brought back by BD2412 because "This seems like an entirely valid page."
  15. User talk:StaniforthHistorian - Wikipedia (archive)
  16. User:Bbb23/d-batch - Wikipedia (archive)
  17. User:Bbb23/Userbox/Not_Dude - "Bbb23 does not wish to be called Dude. Not now, not ever."
  18. User:Bbb23 - Wikipedia (2020-03-22)
  19. Bbb23 retiring: June 22, 2020 (archive), unretiring: May 14, 2021 (archive). Editor statistics for Bbb23 (archive 2023-12) show he resumed editing in March 2021.
  20. Template:Retired - Wikipedia
  21. Revocation of access to non-public information: Bbb23

Bbb23 is part of a series on

Wikipedia

Visit the Wikipedia Portal for complete coverage.

Bbb23 is part of a series on

Truth

Visit the Truth Portal for complete coverage.

Featured article December 19 - 20, 2023
Preceded by
Sanctioned Suicide
Bbb23 Succeeded by
The Completionist